NEPAL ACCREDITATION FOUNDATION (NAF)

NAF-SCH-VVB-CHK-01

ISO/IEC 17029:2019 Assessment Checklist for Validation and Verification Bodies

Part 1: Principles (Clause 4)
Clause Assessment Requirement Compliance Objective Evidence / Assessor Findings
4.2.1 Does the VVB deploy a method for reaching reliable and reproducible validation/verification conclusions based on sufficient and appropriate objective evidence?


4.2.3 Are validation/verification activities, findings, and statements—including significant obstacles and unresolved diverging views—truthfully and accurately reflected (Fair Presentation)?


Part 2: General Requirements (Clause 5)
Clause Assessment Requirement Compliance Objective Evidence / Assessor Findings
5.1 Is the VVB a legal entity, or a defined part of a legal entity, that can be held legally responsible for all its validation/verification activities?


5.3.3 Does the VVB actively monitor its activities and relationships (including personnel relationships) to identify threats to its impartiality?


5.3.7 Are reviews and decisions made by personnel strictly different from those who carried out the validation/verification execution?


5.3.9 Is the VVB strictly prohibited from offering or providing both consultancy and validation/verification for the same claim from the same client?


5.4 Can the VVB demonstrate it has evaluated the risks arising from its activities and has adequate arrangements (e.g., insurance/reserves) to cover liabilities?


Part 3: Structural Requirements (Clause 6)
Clause Assessment Requirement Compliance Objective Evidence / Assessor Findings
6.1.3 Is the organizational structure documented, including duties, responsibilities, authorities of management, personnel, and any committees?


6.1.4 Has top management been explicitly identified as having overall authority for policy development, finance supervision, and ensuring impartiality?


6.2.1 Does the VVB have a process for the effective control of activities delivered by branch offices, partnerships, agents, or franchisees?


Part 4: Resource Requirements (Clause 7)
Clause Assessment Requirement Compliance Objective Evidence / Assessor Findings
7.2.2 Do all personnel involved in activities enter into legally enforceable agreements committing to impartiality, confidentiality, and declaring conflicts of interest?


7.2.5 Are personnel who provided consultancy on a claim barred from performing V/V activities on that claim for a specified period to minimize impartiality threats?


7.3.2 Does the VVB determine competence criteria including the ability to apply generic V/V concepts (materiality, assurance levels) and programme knowledge?


7.4 If outsourcing, does the VVB retain core functions (engagement, decision, statement issue), use enforceable agreements, and obtain client consent?


Part 5: Process Requirements (Clause 9)
Clause Assessment Requirement Compliance Objective Evidence / Assessor Findings
9.2.2 Is a pre-engagement review conducted to ensure the claim is understood, requirements are suitable, and the VVB has access to required resources?


9.4.1 Does planning include assessing the risk of a material misstatement regarding the claim and determining necessary evidence-gathering activities?


9.5.4 Does the execution phase involve collecting sufficient objective evidence on original data, ensuring traceability, and identifying misstatements?


9.6.3 Does the independent review confirm that all activities were completed per the agreement and that evidence is sufficient to support the decision?


9.7.2 Does the issued V/V statement state the client’s name, describe the scope, indicate if data was historical/projected, and state the decision?


9.8.1 Are there procedures to manage new facts discovered post-issuance that could materially affect the statement, including potential revision or withdrawal?


9.9 & 9.10 Does the VVB have a documented process to receive, evaluate, track, and make decisions on appeals and complaints independently?


Part 6: Information & Management System Requirements (Clauses 10, 11)
Clause Assessment Requirement Compliance Objective Evidence / Assessor Findings
10.3.1 Does the VVB have rules governing references to validation/verification or use of marks, ensuring traceability and preventing misleading claims?


10.4.3 Are proprietary information and the identities of complaint sources kept strictly confidential, except where authorized by law or contract?


11.2.1 Does top management review the management system at planned intervals to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness?


11.3.3 Are internal audits conducted at planned intervals by internal auditors who do not audit their own work?


11.4 Are there established processes for identifying nonconformities, determining root causes, and implementing effective corrective actions?